UVMC production, ATD vs MKR, EVERYBODY'S HELP REQUESTED

[jemsite]

Originally Posted by codnchips

I caused the last debate - It made a good read!......hijacked the thread though!

what is there to comment on really? photo document 1500+ UV77MCs then we'll have a more scientific tally of production totals AND ratio of MIJ/ATD swirls ...glen

[Rich]

Yea, figured that would be your responce, running.

An 88 guitar sample is PLENTY enough to bunk your claim that there are fewer MKR's than ATD's, period. But you'll probably have the comeback "the next 20 to show could all be ATD's"

[jemsite]

you obviously have never been introduced to the idea of a "scientific sample" and instead would rather jump to conclusions

right or wrong, to say your methodology is poor is being too generous.

there IS nothing to comment on. I know you feel Darren is several hundred MCs off on HIS counts but i've said repeatedly that i'd wager HEAVILY that Ibanez was the one several hundred off (too low) on the numbers released. for a reasonable guy, why this is still beyond your comprehension level is a mystery : ...glen

[Rich]

YOU were the one arguing there were way more ATD's than MKR's. Scientific or not the sample is LARGE ENOUGH to show the truth which you so obviously love to avoid.

[jemsite]

you've sampled less than 10% of the MCs "said" to be produced and you're jumping up and down celebrating your correct "conclusion".

ok... whatever. ROTF ...glen

[Rich]

IMO it's probably less than 5%, but when the percentages change little as more are added so you can just stick your head back in the sand and avoid the truth all you want

[jemsite]

Originally Posted by Rich

IMO it's probably less than 5%, but when the percentages change little as more are added so you can just stick your head back in the sand and avoid the truth all you want

this is too dumb a comment to waste an effort "debating" further ...glen

[Rich]

Why? You've spent the last 5 years making your dumb comments about how the only reson there seemed to be more MKR's was because of the same 10 that kept trading hands publicly

[jemsite]

Originally Posted by Rich

Why? You've spent the last 5 years making your dumb comments about how the only reson there seemed to be more MKR's was because of the same 10 that kept trading hands publicly

earth to rich...

i owned (not just brokered) THREE mkrs, likely before one ever graced your couch

i have a little bit better grasp on this than you, with ZERO agenda on the issue.

if you want to have a "discussion" then post a fact or two and leave out the hyperbole and BS. until then kindly leave me out of the conversation :P ...glen

[Rich]

The only agenda I have is finding the truth because you're "version" isn't borne out in fact.. I've owned 20 UVMC's [NOT brokered], your point? YOU have a better grasp on this?!?! That's HILLARIOUS!!

[jemsite]

Originally Posted by jemsite

when did you ask? use what you like, just put a small note "use with permission from jemsite.com" please to avoid potential email (this site stole your graphics. lol) ....glen

btw - looking at these galleries, as painful to the eyes as they might be, i don't see the permission text as i requested/required. ...glen

[Rich]

The truth too painful for you?

I wasn't trying to make some "Gallery", it's just a body shot that was clear enough to distinguish an individual guitar. Some of them were blown up from thumbnails for christ sake. And still some of the worst ones were from your gallery

Disclaimer added and thanks for reminding me .

[UserName]

cut.

note that multiple usernames are NOT permitted by forum rule.

[Rich]

It's the North Jersey Soprano wannabe in his blood

[jemsite]

Originally Posted by Rich

The truth too painful for you?

Last time real slow...

I
don't
care

how many UV77MCs were made by who, when where and why

The only think painful, is the annoying dragging me into this "conversation" and me being misquoted.

Get the MIJ production totals and i'll update the spec sheet accordingly... glen