RG-ART Guitar Registry - tracking these guitars - post here - Page 6

Kevan · #76 01-10-2002, 05:20 AM

Quote:

Rich on 11:41 am on Jan. 8, 2002
...But in a nutshell, yes, you can presume that all those #'s are Arts.

Damn that's funny, but I'll be laughing harder when it's proven false. *:-)

Rich · #77 01-10-2002, 12:36 PM

Damn that's funny, how you'll agree privately on the phone but just want to butt heads in here. Curious.

Get your laughs now, there won't be anything for you to laugh at later. :laugh:

Kevan · #78 01-10-2002, 03:54 PM

I'm not butting heads; I'm just waiting.
Like I said in the *other* thread...you're looking at over 34,000 RG-ART's.
"...yeah, an order of cheese fries, and a side of reality please."

We now return you to your regularly scheduled thread....

Rich · #79 01-10-2002, 04:15 PM

Yes you are, and evidently since you didn't visit the other thread for your answer....

**jemsite** · #80 01-10-2002, 04:23 PM

because some don't know when to say when...

so...

anyways.....

since 13 ARTS are identified...

does this mean we FOUND THEM ALL

and if so... why did Ibanez make ONE EXTRA :rotf:

DROP THE CONVERSATION HERE PLEASE

Rich · #81 01-12-2002, 01:03 AM

Here's the control # for the ex Green Audio Art.

970544

Project Guitar · #82 01-12-2002, 04:23 PM

Quote:

jemsite on 3:23 pm on Jan. 10, 2002
because some don't know when to say when...

so...

anyways.....

since 13 ARTS are identified...

and if so... why did Ibanez make ONE EXTRA :rotf:

Proto Type maybe?

Kevan · #83 01-12-2002, 04:59 PM

Nope, but close. *
If you work out the control numbers in that last one, to correspond with a letter in the alphabet, it says:
4 G L E N C

ROFLMFAO!

p4t4h · #84 01-22-2002, 06:20 PM

Looks like the webmaster of jameslabrie.com has/used to have one..? -->Rob

Rich · #85 01-22-2002, 06:57 PM

GOOD EYE!! And here they are

F9738849 & 970865

HIS ROYAL DARKNESS · #86 01-29-2002, 09:53 PM

Gentlemen,

Are we any closer to knowing the total production number of the RG-ART1 now? *Are these numbers helping us out of confusing us more?

later,
Chris

**jemsite** · #87 01-29-2002, 11:33 PM

Quote:

HIS ROYAL DARKNESS on 8:53 pm on Jan. 29, 2002
Gentlemen, Are we any closer to knowing the total production number of the RG-ART1 now? *Are these numbers helping us out of confusing us more?later, Chris

hehe... this question really opens a can of worms :biggrin:

you can discuss the totals, etc at this thread started by Rich:
http://jemsiteforum.com/board/topic....amp;replies=19

we have tracked over a dozen ARTs, disproving one theory that maybe 12 were made. It stands to reason that we did NOT track all or even a large percent of ARTs yet... hence production totals are a guess at best... glen

Rich · #88 01-29-2002, 11:50 PM

Actually I've got a good guess of the range final production will fall into, and every number helps, especially the #'s that extend the batch ranges. It's all in the other thread.

Except any predictions of total production, I'm saving that boxing match for later when I have more #'s.

Kevan · #89 01-30-2002, 12:20 PM

Quote:

jemsite on 10:33 pm on Jan. 29, 2002
...or even a large percent of ARTs yet... glen

Based on.....what?

**jemsite** · #90 01-30-2002, 12:26 PM

reads Kev's post via email... hits delete key... shakes head