<back   Jemsite > Guitars and Gear > JS (Satriani Model) Ibanez Guitars

JS (Satriani Model) Ibanez Guitars Discussion about JS (Joe Satriani Model) Ibanez Guitars

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-23-2006, 09:51 AM
ThrashingMad  is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Rostock, Germany
Posts: 5  -  iTrader: (0)

Why did Satch choose 6105?


It's very interesting for me, because i always thought, that 'real' jumbo frets would be the better chose, especially for legato playing, which is a distinctive technique of MR.Satriani.

and furthermore: why do you like 6105-frets, and in case - why you don't?
quote
  #2  
Old 05-23-2006, 09:53 AM
jimmyfingersminion  is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bolton UK
Posts: 219  -  iTrader: (2)

Re: Why did Satch choose 6105?


satriani has stated that his ibanez guitars were meant to feel like a hybrid of his old favourite guitars, not like modern shred machines, that is why he likes the 6105 frets.
quote
  #3  
Old 05-23-2006, 09:56 AM
ThrashingMad  is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Rostock, Germany
Posts: 5  -  iTrader: (0)

Re: Why did Satch choose 6105?


and ... do jumbofrets make legato (... or shred-playing in general)- easier?

are there any advantages of the 6105 in comparison to jumbo-frets?

maybe more space for vibrato?!
quote
  #4  
Old 05-23-2006, 10:45 AM
moebius  is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 2,276  -  iTrader: (0)

Re: Why did Satch choose 6105?


I don't think they make legato any easier or difficult. I personally am not a fan of jumbo frets. They just don't feel right to my fingers. I perfer thin tall frets to short fat ones. But I think it is just a matter of personal taste. I feel much more accurate with my fingers using 6105 frets.
quote
  #5  
Old 05-23-2006, 09:48 PM
(a)
ScottB  is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pasadena, MD
Posts: 2,209  -  iTrader: (12)

Re: Why did Satch choose 6105?


The 6105 frets are very close in height to the jumbos found on Ibanez RGs. They're just more narrow.

I prefer the 6105s on my Jem and RG Prestige necks when compared to the jumbos on my RG550 and RG321MH.
quote
  #6  
Old 05-24-2006, 12:27 AM
JESTER700  is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Posts: 2,234  -  iTrader: (0)

Re: Why did Satch choose 6105?


I preferred the radius frets. I think they were close to what I get on my Carvins these days - close to a Dunlop 6150 (.103 x .48 )

Last edited by JESTER700; 05-24-2006 at 08:55 AM.
quote
  #7  
Old 05-24-2006, 02:11 AM
Shredcows  is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 506  -  iTrader: (1)

Re: Why did Satch choose 6105?


i used a Saber with the stock ibanez jumbo fretwires for 3 yrs. I had my guitar refretted with fretwire very similiar to 6105s. I am now totally spoilt! Jumbo frets feel clumsy to me... .
quote
  #8  
Old 05-24-2006, 02:16 AM
ThrashingMad  is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Rostock, Germany
Posts: 5  -  iTrader: (0)

Re: Why did Satch choose 6105?


i think they're great because of the space you have to form the tone. also on the higher frets.

it is really great to hear you saying how familiar you are with the 6105's, because i want to buy a satch (used) and i was not shure about the frets, though i tested the guitar sometimes.

thx for all opinions
quote
  #9  
Old 05-24-2006, 09:28 AM
saTa  is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 398  -  iTrader: (1)

Re: Why did Satch choose 6105?


I reckon he did because he liked them, doh?
quote
  #10  
Old 05-24-2006, 01:33 PM
toneboy  is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 1,674  -  iTrader: (2)
Reviews: 1

Re: Why did Satch choose 6105?


Visit Warmoth's site for a great comparison chart of the different fret sizes they offer.
quote
  #11  
Old 05-24-2006, 07:39 PM
rty13ibz98  is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: LR, AR
Posts: 1,983  -  iTrader: (34)

Re: Why did Satch choose 6105?


i love 6105 frets. they feel the most vintage. hate to say it, but the mexican strat necks feel great, and the fretwire on them is very close to 6105. i have a ton of guitars and have no problem doing legato on any.

rich
quote
  #12  
Old 05-25-2006, 12:35 AM
Rodney James  is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,295  -  iTrader: (8)

Re: Why did Satch choose 6105?


6105's are tall like the 6100's, however not as wide, the main advantage, the intonation is better with 6105's. They are easier to hold true in the beginning and especially over time as the frets wear, 6100's are so wide, they wear uneven causing pitch fluctuations all up the board according to the different amounts of wear at different areas. (Wider frets have more of a top area to wear unevenly)

However it's also about feel & tone, 6100's do create a little different tension when fretting due to the contact points of the string to the fret and measurement between the edge of each fret surrounding the area being fretted. Tone, well of course there is more metal involved (Contact with the string) with 6100's, so the tone is slightly effected when compared to 6105's.

Depending on ones playing style, there are pros and cons to both.
quote
  #13  
Old 05-25-2006, 01:06 AM
SonataGuitarist  is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 408  -  iTrader: (2)

Re: Why did Satch choose 6105?


Quote:
Originally Posted by rty13ibz98
i love 6105 frets. they feel the most vintage. hate to say it, but the mexican strat necks feel great, and the fretwire on them is very close to 6105. i have a ton of guitars and have no problem doing legato on any.

rich
+1, and another +1.

I constantly rant about my MIM fat strat having my favorite neck and frets ever. They feel the most personal and accurate to me, and recently I've been researching their similarity to the 6105. Im very eager to try one of the 6105 equipped Ibbys since the Jumbos dont quite do it for me.
Im thinkin that JS would be pretty nice.... or a VSBL..

\00/
quote
  #14  
Old 05-25-2006, 01:11 AM
King Nothing  is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SPRING, TX
Posts: 333  -  iTrader: (1)

Re: Why did Satch choose 6105?


Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreamJem7
The 6105 frets are very close in height to the jumbos found on Ibanez RGs. They're just more narrow.

I prefer the 6105s on my Jem and RG Prestige necks when compared to the jumbos on my RG550 and RG321MH.
Do all rg prestiges have 6105s? Ibanez.com says they are jumbo
quote
  #15  
Old 05-25-2006, 01:18 AM
SonataGuitarist  is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 408  -  iTrader: (2)

Re: Why did Satch choose 6105?


Quote:
Originally Posted by King Nothing
Do all rg prestiges have 6105s? Ibanez.com says they are jumbo
RG Prestiges have jumbos.
6105 comes on JS 1000, 1200, and the Jems.
quote
Reply

Tags
death metal, fat strat, fret size, ibanez guitars, ibanez jem, jumbo frets, mexican strat, neck shape, prestige necks, shred machine, strat style


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Show/Hide Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Show/Hide Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Boss DS-1 Satch and Vai Tones... Lonely Raven Gear and Equipment 41 01-23-2004 09:32 PM
update from Satch POST G3. davester1234 Players, Bands, People, Music & Tours 5 11-18-2003 12:40 PM
Satch Boogie 0.34 bloodandtears Guitar Lessons & Music Theory 1 05-26-2003 02:25 PM
Getting that Satch sound with your DS-1? Lonely Raven Gear and Equipment 7 06-18-2002 08:24 PM
The Satch harmonic run - Not the Satch scream thing rikkbeatty Guitar Lessons & Music Theory 9 10-09-2001 11:01 PM

Sitemap:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c) jemsite.com
Powered by