<back   Jemsite > Guitars and Gear > Other Ibanez Guitars (including Premiums)

Other Ibanez Guitars (including Premiums) Discussion about other Ibanez 6-string Guitars (including Premiums) not covered in the above topics.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 08-25-2008, 11:47 AM
S-man  is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: US - MD
Posts: 1,757  -  iTrader: (0)

Re: [Did Ibanez mess] up the S-series


The first S guitars (Saber) had something to prove, as did all of Ibanez's guitars. Many vewied them as cheap "Jap" guitars (no offence).
They proved them wrong. Ibanez did quite well and made quality instruments for many years after that. At some point Ibanez rose to become a "respectable" guitar manufacturer, even above average. They continued for several years after that. It was then that they were starting to get into major mass production. Along with that became a need to minimize production cost etc. (long story short). As time passed they needed to start manufacturing guitars at different locations (read costs). They had tried manufacturing guitars in Korea and other countries and had been fairly succesfull producing and selling those instruments. Though most of them were lower/inexpensive models (series). After that succes they moved on to include some more and more and more...

In recent history, it has become harder and harder to obtain quality woods (that's another story/post)


I could include alot more detail.....


Anyway, Fast Forward.

Now all 22 fret S guitars are made in korea. What has changed? Alot. If you read the book, "Ibanez the Untold Story", you will see that Ibanez themselves had concerns about exporting it's manufacturing to Korea. Well.....they made that work for a while, but when they included ALL of the S series....they messed up. Maybe it was because sales were down and the newly ZR equipped S MIJ wasn't doing well. There weren't many mainstream guitarist playing the S either. So...here we are.



Oh just so you know...I'm not just some guy that says this because I own this one or that one.



Those three guitars illustrate almost every iteration of S made. 1990-2006...

ZR trem
Lo PRo
Edge

ANNJ Wizard II (Prestige 5pc.)
ANNJ Wizard I (1pc.)
Standard Neck Joint (1pc.)

All bound and all the top of the line S guitars availible at the time. It wasn't long after 97 that you had to buy a "Prestige S" to get what was once availible as a 540....think about it. Then they moved it all to Korea.










Ok...so what has changed?


Body

The Korean made S series guitar is thicker. Not only the horns, but the entire body. You can clearly see the increase in the horn size from some of the pictures posted on this forum. The thing that is difficult to see... is the thickness towards the center of the body. It is not proportional to the increased thickness of the horns. It is even thicker, proportionally. At least that is my experience.

The neck pocket is not routed as deep as it used to be. Even the guitars that appear to have "decent" routes are not as deep. It appears as if they are, but they are not. Why?..The thickness of the fretboard and binding has increased. This gives the illusion that it's as deep, on some examples, but in the end it's still not as deep.

Overall, this makes the guitar heavier and takes away from some of what used to make the S a thin/sleek guitar.

And, the shallow neck pocket joint (SNPJ) requires the pups and bridge to be raised higher above the body. Again, this takes away from the sleekness of the guitar.

Obiviously there are other perceived differences that I won't bother going into at this point.



More pics...


1997 S540FMTP(MIJ) Neck Pocket....





2006 S2170(MIK) "Prestige" Neck Pocket....






This is what it does to the bridge and pup height....















Neck

All Korean made S guitars are equipped with Wizard II necks, which are thicker. The difference with the S is that it also has a different curvature/profile on the back of neck when compared to a Wizard I. This is not as apparent with other series such as the RG. The RG retains a similar profile with it's Wizard II neck... I don't know why they did this?

Anyway...it's a little odd.

Additionally, the Wizard II has a 400mm fretboard radius as opposed to the 430mm on the Wizard I. The result is a fretboard with more curvature. This affects the height in which the action can be set. More curvature...higher action. Less curvature lower action. Even if you manage to obtain the same action height, the Wizard II will fret out with large bends (as in bending notes on the fretboard)

Plus the fretboard/binding is thicker, as I mentioned before.


Couple all of this with the additonal weight and you may find that what was once similar, is no longer.






Trem


Korean manufactured S guitars always had some trem issues, until the ZR. The ZR is a pretty nice unit. It is one of the "smoothest" trems out there. IT elevated korean manufactured S guitar trems. Though, it's had it's far share of problems. The D-tuner thing never really worked out and before the thumbwheel... there were problems with the allen key spring adjustment. Additionally, the trem arm holder is still an ongoing problem. Recently there have been reports of rattling... Like rattling saddles.

The ZR is also different in that it provides a different fulcrum and pivot geometry. In simple terms...it requires more bar movement to obtain the same amount of pitch change compared to the knife edge type trem units.

In retrospect, the edge and lopro units on the MIJ guitars have only really suffered from one issue. That would be the loose trem bar syndrome. The problem is with the plastic bushings...they wear out too quickly. This is easily fixed with some teflon tape. I've also had the same problem with the ZR (trem bar too loose).
I used the same teflon tape to fix that as well.






Pickups

This will be short. The IBZ pups, currently availible on the prestige only, do not compare to the IBZ pups that were offered when the guitars were made in Japan. They claim they are still MADE by Dimarzio. Honestly, I have my doubts. Pups are subjective, so I won't say much more.






Hardware

The cosmo finish on the pup rings, particularly my S2170's has been crap. I wore the finish off in a month.
Conversly, the finish on my 1990 (I purchased it brand new) has held up wonderfully for 17+ years.

The volume and tone knobs are now plastic, at least on the inside. The knobs on my 90 S540LTD are SOLID metal.

The tuning keys have plastic knobs on my S2170, the S540LTLD are metal. The plastic keys look cool and match the scheme of the S2170, but... at the end of the day, I'd rather have metal over plastic (in most cases).

The locknut mounting hardware is missing the locking washer...I believe this is true of all current Ibanez guitars (MIJ included).



Quality Control


Not very good. IMHO. Lack of consistency.....at best.

The two S2170's had the following problems:


Cracked truss rod cover.

Crooked pup ring.

Crooked trem.

Loose parts flopping around in the case during shipping. (allen screw and locking pad for locknut)

No intonation setup.

No truss rod adjustment (completely loose... floppy loose)

etc.






Another pic....





You can't make this stuff up! lol




So...you made it this far Congratz!!!


Again, I could have said ALOT more. The new MIK S isn't a horrible guitar by far. So don't hate me. Ibanez probably hates me now.


S-man
quote
  #62  
Old 08-25-2008, 11:51 AM
S-man  is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: US - MD
Posts: 1,757  -  iTrader: (0)

Re: [Did Ibanez mess] up the S-series


Here is a pic that shows the difference in some of the neck profiles.



Wizard I block heel, Wizard I AANJ, and MIK Wizard II AANJ (left to right)

The guitar on the left is a 1990 S540LTD.
quote
  #63  
Old 08-25-2008, 12:42 PM
GuitarBizarre  is online
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,184  -  iTrader: (0)

Re: [Did Ibanez mess] up the S-series


S-Man, I appreaciate that everything you've said is true, but heres the thing: All the way through this thread the main bitches people have had have been that the Wizard II neck sucks, or the pickups suck, or the bridge sucks because people want a lopro, or this that and the other.

The point I was trying to make is that with the Egen ibanez have specced a guitar that eliminates most if not all of those concerns....yet it gets absolutely no attention, because people are still too busy bitching about problems on the other models that they want ibanez to change 'just because they want this and that'

People are never going to be 100% satisfied. They're solved the spec problems with the egen, next they'll move them back to japan, then people will find something else to not like, like the new top lok or they'll claim the screws are all ****ty or something.


Its neverending, and while making sure ibanez know this is a definite good move, in practice its become people bitching about the same issue for years on end without looking at whats actually been done.

Edit: Oh, and I don't know what the big problem is with the ZR's range of pitch. I have an original edge and a ZR and I have no problems diving into subterranea or climbing the stratosphere with either of them. In fact, for pitch raising I kinda prefer the ZR, because its motion doesn't drastically lower the action like my Edge does, so it never frets out on big pullups.
quote
  #64  
Old 08-25-2008, 02:04 PM
S-man  is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: US - MD
Posts: 1,757  -  iTrader: (0)

Re: [Did Ibanez mess] up the S-series


Oh I agree...they will NEVER please everyone.

As far as the ZR goes....I think it's a pretty cool trem. I like it much better than the Khaler it reminds me of. I don't think there is a problem with the range. But, it does require more trem bar movement to realize the same amount of pitch change when compared to the knife edge systems. Personally, I prefer the feel of the knife edge systems. That doesn't mean that there is something wrong with the ZR.... That is just MY preference. I wouldn't say it's a deal breaker.

I'm also glad that Ibanez has fix the problem with the trem arm holder this year. So, in the end, there is nothing really wrong with the ZR. I like using the ZR....it's super smooth. But, if I only had one trem to choose from.... it would be the edge, lo-pro, edge pro, or edge zero.
quote
Reply

Tags
arm holder, dot inlay, dot inlays, edge trem, edge zero, equipped guitar, floating tremolo, floyd rose, locking stud, locking studs, mij guitars, pro edge, standard neck, tremolo bar


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Show/Hide Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Show/Hide Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question about the Ibanez JEM series shreddersymphony JEM and Universe Guitars 95 03-23-2008 02:55 PM
F/S Ibanez Joe Satriani 1000 signature series extremeblaster01 Classified Ads: Guitars and Gear 2 08-25-2007 02:41 PM
Ibanez S series 7 stringer.. Dr Mindcrime Other 7-string Guitars 23 04-16-2006 05:53 AM
for trade , ibanez usrg30 j.arledge Classified Ads: Guitars and Gear 2 03-07-2006 10:14 PM
Ibanez J-Custom & Prestige Overview and F.A.Q. jemsite J-Custom, USA Custom & Prestige Ibanez Guitars 0 05-16-2002 01:48 AM

Sitemap:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c) jemsite.com