Go Back   Jemsite > Guitars and Gear > Other 7-string Guitars

Other 7-string Guitars 7-string, 8-string & extend-range guitars guitar talk only here. All makes and models except the Universe.



Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-17-2005, 05:34 AM
Munkipuss Munkipuss is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 9  -  iTrader: (0)
Question

RG1527 Neck Dimensions Vs Universe Neck Dimesnions


Hi folks,

I'm considering buying an RG-5127. I know that a Universe neck is unfinished, whereas an RG7 neck tends to have a satin finsih. Can anyone withe experience tell me whether or not the necks have the same dimensions????

I know that the old RG7620 neck used to be the same size/shape as a UV.

Thanks.
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-18-2005, 01:39 PM
Drew Drew is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Somerville, MA
Posts: 4,973  -  iTrader: (4)

Re: RG1527 Neck Dimensions Vs Universe Neck Dimesnions


Quote:
Originally Posted by Munkipuss
I know that the old RG7620 neck used to be the same size/shape as a UV.
Not technically true - they're the same size, but their profiles are QUITE different, at least on my '99 RG and '91 UV. The UV has a much smoother, more "c" shaped taper, while the RG's is more abrupt and more "D" shaped. Resultingly, the RG feels a bit girthier. I prefer the UV, myself, but it's a taste thing.

I'd assume the 1527 is virtually identical with the 7620.

-D
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-21-2005, 08:20 PM
Flobanez's Avatar
Flobanez Flobanez is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Maine
Posts: 5,498  -  iTrader: (1)

Re: RG1527 Neck Dimensions Vs Universe Neck Dimesnions


My 7620 feels thicker than my UV. I think they are same though after
comparing. The 7620 is definately more glossy as my PWH is more bare but smooth.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-22-2005, 11:31 AM
Drew Drew is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Somerville, MA
Posts: 4,973  -  iTrader: (4)

Re: RG1527 Neck Dimensions Vs Universe Neck Dimesnions


Yeah, it has to do with the shape of the neck, man. Same thickness, it's just the RG's taper is more abrupt, so it's chubbier on the sides than the UV is.

-D
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-02-2005, 01:00 AM
Gresh Gresh is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 1,564  -  iTrader: (10)

Re: RG1527 Neck Dimensions Vs Universe Neck Dimesnions


Not trying to be a nit-picker, but the old UV profile is much different than the new UV777BK, or at least the BK back in 99 or so. Haven't felt a brand new one lately. The old PWHs were more like a wizard type neck, where the new UV is more ultra shaped, even viper (think JPM).
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-02-2005, 10:31 AM
Drew Drew is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Somerville, MA
Posts: 4,973  -  iTrader: (4)

Re: RG1527 Neck Dimensions Vs Universe Neck Dimesnions


So I hear... I guess I just have to take a crack at one of the newer UV necks and see how they measure up... It's a cruel, cruel world, isn't it?

-D
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-05-2005, 08:53 AM
CrossingStar CrossingStar is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Minneapolis MN
Posts: 1,260  -  iTrader: (0)

Re: RG1527 Neck Dimensions Vs Universe Neck Dimesnions


I agree with Gresh. I used to own a 91 UV777GR and I traded with LGM for a 2000 UV777BK and the old GR neck was thinner. Between the RG 1527 and my 2000 UV, I can't tell the difference. They are about the same.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


 
You may also search for:

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Sitemap:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c) jemsite.com