<back   Jemsite > Guitars and Gear > Gear and Equipment

Gear and Equipment Gear & equipment disussed here. Amps, pedals, whatever.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-04-2007, 10:15 PM
AKMG  is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SAN JOSE, CA
Posts: 352  -  iTrader: (0)

Rack vs. Head?


No, this is not a sexual question. I'm just wondering why some people use rackmounted heads (i.e. Mesa Stereo 20/20) instead of a regular head (i.e. Mesa Triple Rectifier).
quote
  #2  
Old 03-04-2007, 10:21 PM
Dee  is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: 渋谷区、東京都
Posts: 8,514  -  iTrader: (2)

Re: Rack vs. Head?


Cause it looks cool? Dunno. I like the V-Amp Pro! Heh.
quote
  #3  
Old 03-04-2007, 10:55 PM
crevis  is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,599  -  iTrader: (1)

Re: Rack vs. Head?


It takes up less space and perrforms a specific task rather than getting alot of effects you may not want.
quote
  #4  
Old 03-04-2007, 11:38 PM
Stygian  is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: IL, USA
Posts: 317  -  iTrader: (6)
Reviews: 2

Re: Rack vs. Head?


I use rack gear, because it's versatile and the switchability is easy (doesn't cost extra, MIDI), depending on what specific units you use. Also, yes I like the looks of all the blinking lights. Seriously, I like that you can seperate your preamp section from your poweramp, and that you can control everything via a MIDI pedal. It's like constructing your own best-of-the-best effects processor. It's up to you how detailed you get with it.

I'm able to use an Engl tube preamp which I think has a great clean and distortion. I'm not limited in the power section. If I want to go budget with no hassles and never have to change my power tubes, I can get a 200 watt solid state power amp. If I don't play shows I can pair my Engl preamp with a Mesa/Boogie 20/20 power amp and have tube warmth at bedroom volumes. It's this versatility that is nice.

Also, it all fits within a rack, so you have your own protection case for your amp. The only problem is that you have to organize your wiring and it's probably best to use a straight 4x12 rather than angled, because racks are deep. Soundwise, there's room for arguing. I'll use either, I'm actually not biased, but I am one of the minority of guitar players today that uses an all-rack setup. Those are some of my reasons.
quote
  #5  
Old 03-04-2007, 11:50 PM
AKMG  is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SAN JOSE, CA
Posts: 352  -  iTrader: (0)

Re: Rack vs. Head?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Stygian View Post
I use rack gear, because it's versatile and the switchability is easy (doesn't cost extra, MIDI), depending on what specific units you use. Also, yes I like the looks of all the blinking lights. Seriously, I like that you can seperate your preamp section from your poweramp, and that you can control everything via a MIDI pedal. It's like constructing your own best-of-the-best effects processor. It's up to you how detailed you get with it.

I'm able to use an Engl tube preamp which I think has a great clean and distortion. I'm not limited in the power section. If I want to go budget with no hassles and never have to change my power tubes, I can get a 200 watt solid state power amp. If I don't play shows I can pair my Engl preamp with a Mesa/Boogie 20/20 power amp and have tube warmth at bedroom volumes. It's this versatility that is nice.

Also, it all fits within a rack, so you have your own protection case for your amp. The only problem is that you have to organize your wiring and it's probably best to use a straight 4x12 rather than angled, because racks are deep. Soundwise, there's room for arguing. I'll use either, I'm actually not biased, but I am one of the minority of guitar players today that uses an all-rack setup. Those are some of my reasons.
So what would a basic rack consist of? Just a preamp and a power amp?
quote
  #6  
Old 03-05-2007, 12:00 AM
Stygian  is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: IL, USA
Posts: 317  -  iTrader: (6)
Reviews: 2

Re: Rack vs. Head?


Yes, a preamp and poweramp would be equivalent to a head. So long as you buy equipment meant for guitar application. For effects you can go with an all in one unit, or even a few units (one with best chorus, one with best delay, etc). You can also put a bunch of pedals on a rack tray and control them with the right equipment, though that gets pricy and you can do that with a head anyways. Many people just use racks for effects, that's very common. Not too many use all-rack setups though. I like it, but I keep mine simple, it's only 6 spaces.

Last edited by Stygian; 03-05-2007 at 12:08 AM.
quote
  #7  
Old 03-05-2007, 12:14 AM
(a)
elcid  is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: chicago
Posts: 8,718  -  iTrader: (12)

Re: Rack vs. Head?


I went through the rack thing and now I'm back to just a head. I like the simplicity.
quote
  #8  
Old 03-05-2007, 01:15 AM
Dee  is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: 渋谷区、東京都
Posts: 8,514  -  iTrader: (2)

Re: Rack vs. Head?


I agree with Elcid, pretty much. Keep it simple -- that's the key to good tone. The more effects, the more the signal is filtered through tons of crap and the weaker it gets. One good amp, a few good stomp boxes, that's all you really need! I used have several multi-effects units and all they did was hinder my playing. I spent more time programming than jamming! Saying that, though, there are some wicked rack-mounted bits and pieces around, but I can't afford those anyway. Evantide Harmonizer's for example. The flexiblity is good with rack-mount gear, but to be honest, I never used many sounds in a band / gig situation anyways.

I'm just buzzing off this V-Amp Pro right now. Some will say "huh, you loser, it's a cheap piece of crap!", but they couldn't be more wrong, this thing is great direct into the PC or hifi, and it's all I need for recording purposes. It has some awesome, very usable sounds. I don't really want much more stuff, though. A good wah pedal and maybe an octave divider or Whammy pedal, that will probably be my next pedal purchase.
quote
  #9  
Old 03-05-2007, 01:48 AM
RSVampire  is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Morgan Hill, CA
Posts: 1,813  -  iTrader: (6)

Re: Rack vs. Head?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Dee View Post
I agree with Elcid, pretty much. Keep it simple -- that's the key to good tone. The more effects, the more the signal is filtered through tons of crap and the weaker it gets.
I also agree with Elcid and you Dee. Some of the best tones I've heard from people is a guitar plugged straight into a cranked up amplifier.
quote
  #10  
Old 03-05-2007, 02:15 AM
Dee  is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: 渋谷区、東京都
Posts: 8,514  -  iTrader: (2)

Re: Rack vs. Head?


Nice and raw!
quote
  #11  
Old 03-05-2007, 02:55 AM
nightfiend14  is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: IA, USA
Posts: 1,005  -  iTrader: (10)

Re: Rack vs. Head?


Hey Dee, there is a vamp group on yahoo I joined after getting my vamp that has lots of presets you can download, and a lot more info regarding the various vamp products, what want to check that you.
quote
  #12  
Old 03-05-2007, 01:50 PM
bammbamm  is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Chicagoland, IL.
Posts: 4,134  -  iTrader: (16)
Reviews: 1

Re: Rack vs. Head?


It's really a preference thing.
I'm running the Mesa Triaxis and 20/20 power amp with a few effects in the loop.
I guess a 3 channel amp would do what I need at this stage, but it's nice to have th ability to tap every sound from the oldr MArk series as well as the rectos.

Having the ability to be modular is my reasoning for using a rack system.
You buy a head, you get 2 basic sounds that you will generally use.
A preamp with midi control gives you MUCH more flexibility.
Also, if I decide I need the 50/50 or 2:100 I can just sell the 20/20 and buy the power section I need and I don't need to worry about my tone changing drastically. Right now, I'm in the market for the TC G-system. Again, modular.
Makes life WAY easier than having a pedal board, loops to and from my amp all over the floor, etc...

It tidy's things up in the long run, unless you're just running a guitar-head-cab set up.
quote
  #13  
Old 03-05-2007, 04:58 PM
Dee  is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: 渋谷区、東京都
Posts: 8,514  -  iTrader: (2)

Re: Rack vs. Head?


Quote:
Originally Posted by nightfiend14 View Post
Hey Dee, there is a vamp group on yahoo I joined after getting my vamp that has lots of presets you can download, and a lot more info regarding the various vamp products, what want to check that you.
Thanks bro. I will take a look soon, only I don't have a midi interface right now so there's no point in downloading presets. Thanks, though! I am currently working on a Holdsworth lead sound, and actually I've gotten fairly close!
quote
  #14  
Old 04-10-2007, 04:25 PM
racerevlon  is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 932  -  iTrader: (1)
Reviews: 107

Re: Rack vs. Head?


Quote:
Originally Posted by elcid View Post
I went through the rack thing and now I'm back to just a head. I like the simplicity.
Indeed--I have a VERY flexible rack setup that allows me to run two different preamps (JMP-1/MP-1) through a Marshall EL84 20/20. Great EL84 low-volume breakup and two different voicings, with one side wet, one side dry.

However, it's a lot easier just plugging into my Hughes & Kettner heads and tearing the paint off the walls...
quote
  #15  
Old 04-10-2007, 05:14 PM
Roland  is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Göteborg, Sweden
Posts: 617  -  iTrader: (0)

Re: Rack vs. Head?


How about a PODxt Live feeding a Carvin TS100-powered stack?
quote



Show/Hide Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rack or Head? goalkpr101 Gear and Equipment 0 07-22-2006 06:35 PM
rack or head? fazehans Gear and Equipment 2 10-29-2004 06:36 PM
How can I control an Amp head and a Rack? jaymond Gear and Equipment 10 11-08-2002 02:30 PM
#@$%*^+@ Rack Buzz ryan Gear and Equipment 4 04-10-2001 03:15 PM

Sitemap:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c) jemsite.com