Go Back   Jemsite > Guitars and Gear > Recording Studio

Recording Studio To discuss recording gear, home studios, home studio PCs, studio techniques and the likes.



Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-24-2002, 02:12 PM
FinnJ FinnJ is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Ireland
Posts: 307  -  iTrader: (0)

Cubase volume question


now this may seem like a silly question to yo pros out there but im only a bedroom recorder so please help!, how do i increase the volume of a track in cubase without using the mixer. i recorded a very low guitar part but now i want to up the volume. i have the mixer set volume at its highest but i want it louder.
thanx
john
Registered Members don't see these ads. Register now it's free!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-24-2002, 02:23 PM
rfb rfb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Manchester
Posts: 66  -  iTrader: (0)
Use the wave editor to normalise the audio in that part. This ups the volume till the loudest peak hits 0db, without changing it in any other way.

- rfb
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-24-2002, 02:39 PM
30yroldpig 30yroldpig is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Montréal, Canada
Posts: 902  -  iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rfb
This ups the volume till the loudest peak hits 0db, without changing it in any other way.
- rfb
Wrong. Normalizing will boost the noise floor as well. Especially since the guitar part was recorded low. Normalizing...BAD

Try using a plug-in compressor. Although the noise floor will increase as well, you will have much more control over it. If you don't have plug-ins...normalizing is the only other option over re-recording your part (My vote for the re-recording).
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-25-2002, 10:35 AM
rfb rfb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Manchester
Posts: 66  -  iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat7
Quote:
Originally Posted by rfb
This ups the volume till the loudest peak hits 0db, without changing it in any other way.
- rfb
Wrong. Normalizing will boost the noise floor as well. Especially since the guitar part was recorded low. Normalizing...BAD
Well, the noise floor is part of the recorded part - so it does exactly the same thing as turning up the volume, if he had any more volume left. Which would be what I said, and what he asked for.

- rfb
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-26-2002, 12:22 PM
30yroldpig 30yroldpig is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Montréal, Canada
Posts: 902  -  iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rfb

Well, the noise floor is part of the recorded part - so it does exactly the same thing as turning up the volume, if he had any more volume left. Which would be what I said, and what he asked for.

- rfb
No it's not the same thing. If you understood what normalising does then you wouldn't say that it's the same as turing up the volume. Understanding signal to noise is extremely important here. A normalise function makes everything loud. Loud is fun, but loud noise sucks.

Why would you want to raise the noise floor by the same proportion as the rest of the audio data? That doesn't make any sense.

Keep your options open. If you have plug-ins, use them before running a normalise function. If you don't have plug-ins, then re-record the part and learn how to record properly, or try different mixing techniques.

To quote a good friend of mine on his opinion of normalising: "It is the way to go - if you're gonna listen to it through your ass"

Just my 2 cents.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-27-2002, 01:42 PM
FinnJ FinnJ is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Ireland
Posts: 307  -  iTrader: (0)
hmmm i dont play on listening to it through my ass
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-27-2002, 01:42 PM
FinnJ FinnJ is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Ireland
Posts: 307  -  iTrader: (0)
play.....DOH!!! i mean plan...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-28-2002, 01:15 PM
rfb rfb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Manchester
Posts: 66  -  iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat7
Quote:
Originally Posted by rfb
Well, the noise floor is part of the recorded part - so it does exactly the same thing as turning up the volume, if he had any more volume left. Which would be what I said, and what he asked for.
No it's not the same thing. If you understood what normalising does then you wouldn't say that it's the same as turing up the volume. Understanding signal to noise is extremely important here. A normalise function makes everything loud. Loud is fun, but loud noise sucks.
Ummm, I do understand what normalising does. It looks like you don't understand what a volume control does (on a playback channel in a digital mixer) - it makes everything that you recorded louder, or quieter, including the noise. A normaliser does this exactly to the point where it would clip if you turn it up any further.

Quote:
Why would you want to raise the noise floor by the same proportion as the rest of the audio data? That doesn't make any sense.
That's what a volume control does, you know. Many people find them useful.

Obviously the best option is to rerecord the part at a better level, and the next best option may well be compression or similar. I'm just answering the question he asked.

- rfb
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-29-2002, 03:57 PM
30yroldpig 30yroldpig is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Montréal, Canada
Posts: 902  -  iTrader: (0)
Dude

It seems you know better.

Quote:
Ummm, I do understand what normalising does. it makes everything that you recorded louder, or quieter, including the noise. A normaliser does this exactly to the point where it would clip if you turn it up any further.
With the volume control you can ride, ie control the level of noise within a mix. It's linear, More the fader goes up, more the noise goes down & vice versa. Therefore more flexible. Add some EQ and maybe you can EQ it out. Once you have normalized an audio clip you have FORCED the noise floor all the way to the same level of the sound. How can you control more?

Quote:
That's what a volume control does, you know. Many people find them useful
Quote:
It looks like you don't understand what a volume control does (on a playback channel in a digital mixer)
-

Please do not patronize me. Unfortunately, my job as an audio technician sometimes requires me to work with crappy audio files that have to be mixed for TV shows. I know a thing or two here about low level audio. No pro normalises.

Granted you answered his question. I'm just saying there's other possibilities.

Cheers
Pat
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-29-2002, 04:33 PM
30yroldpig 30yroldpig is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Montréal, Canada
Posts: 902  -  iTrader: (0)
BTW FinnJ

I don't know about all the tracks you have recorded so far, but try this:

You obviously ran out of head room on the guitar channel in the cubase mixer (that's why you can't go any louder).Try pulling the volume down on the other recorded tracks. You'll also have to experiment with level riding using cubase's automation (it does have automation right?)

Good luck

Pat
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-30-2002, 12:05 PM
rfb rfb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Manchester
Posts: 66  -  iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat7
With the volume control you can ride, ie control the level of noise within a mix. It's linear, More the fader goes up, more the noise goes down & vice versa. Therefore more flexible. Add some EQ and maybe you can EQ it out. Once you have normalized an audio clip you have FORCED the noise floor all the way to the same level of the sound. How can you control more?
Well, by using the volume control. I'm only talking about normalising the audio on the tracks he's recorded the guitar to, track by track, which is trivial to do in Cubase; it's effectively just going to increase the range of his faders so he can get it loud enough.

Quote:
Please do not patronize me.
Well, you started out by claiming I didn't understand what normalising did. I was just responding in kind.

All the best,

- rfb
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-30-2002, 01:39 PM
30yroldpig 30yroldpig is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Montréal, Canada
Posts: 902  -  iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Well, you started out by claiming I didn't understand what normalising did. I was just responding in kind.
You are absolutely right. In fact I re-read my post and indeed it too seemed patronizing and for that I apologise. I never meant to insult.

No hard feelings?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-30-2002, 02:00 PM
rfb rfb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Manchester
Posts: 66  -  iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat7
No hard feelings?
Absolutely none. I apologise too, I need to calm down .

Waiter! Bring me icecream and cuddly kittens!

- rfb
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-30-2002, 04:54 PM
30yroldpig 30yroldpig is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Montréal, Canada
Posts: 902  -  iTrader: (0)
Sweet!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Sitemap:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c) jemsite.com