<back   Jemsite > Guitars and Gear > Recording Studio

Recording Studio To discuss recording gear, home studios, home studio PCs, studio techniques and the likes.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-04-2006, 05:42 PM
Darren Wonnacott  is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 52  -  iTrader: (0)
Question

M-Audio Or Soundblaster Creative


Hey,

I just wondered if someone could tell me which of these soundcards would be better for recording:

Creative Soundblaster Audigy 2 (PCI)

M-Audio Firewire Audiophile.

Thankyou in advance

Darren Wonnacott.
quote
  #2  
Old 03-04-2006, 05:45 PM
(a)
kennydoe  is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 3,416  -  iTrader: (1)

Re: M-Audio Or Soundblaster Creative


I'm using an M-Audio firewire 410 and it works very well. can't speak for the creative. Go with which ever is faster.

~K
quote
  #3  
Old 03-04-2006, 06:45 PM
Darren Wonnacott  is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 52  -  iTrader: (0)

Re: M-Audio Or Soundblaster Creative


Hey,

The Soundblaster has a better input and output latency than the
M-Audio Soundcard I have.

So does this mean the soundblaster card is better than the M-Audio one?

Thanks for your help

Darren
quote
  #4  
Old 03-04-2006, 09:27 PM
razorsuppository  is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 118  -  iTrader: (0)

Re: M-Audio Or Soundblaster Creative


I use the M-Audio 2496. It was sort of a pain in the ass to get all the drivers to work at first, but I have no other complaints - considering the low price. www.myspace.com/mattroberts , go there if you want to hear some recordings I did with it. I also used a Behringer mixer and a Shure SM57.
quote
  #5  
Old 03-05-2006, 04:28 AM
Darren Wonnacott  is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 52  -  iTrader: (0)

Re: M-Audio Or Soundblaster Creative


Hey Matt,

Thanks for your help!

The recordings sound great!

Darren
quote
  #6  
Old 03-05-2006, 04:43 AM
(a)
kennydoe  is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 3,416  -  iTrader: (1)

Re: M-Audio Or Soundblaster Creative


i just finished a recording that had 21 tracks going at once in the last section and there was no latency whatsoever...is that a valid test?

~K
quote
  #7  
Old 03-06-2006, 03:02 AM
razorsuppository  is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 118  -  iTrader: (0)

Re: M-Audio Or Soundblaster Creative


Quote:
Originally Posted by Darren Wonnacott
Hey Matt,

Thanks for your help!

The recordings sound great!

Darren
I'm glad you dig the recordings, thanks. I kinda have latency issues, but I multitrack and run only 384 mb of ram, so I doubt it has anything to do with the sound card. Which M-Audio soundcard did you plan on getting?
quote
  #8  
Old 03-06-2006, 12:00 PM
Darren Wonnacott  is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 52  -  iTrader: (0)

Re: M-Audio Or Soundblaster Creative


I planned on getting the M-Audio Firewire Audiophile

Thanks

Darren
quote
  #9  
Old 03-13-2006, 03:04 PM
Polaris20  is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Illinoize!!
Posts: 1,418  -  iTrader: (0)

Re: M-Audio Or Soundblaster Creative


Anything Creative is craptacular. stick with M-Audio.
quote
  #10  
Old 03-13-2006, 05:54 PM
JESTER700  is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Posts: 2,234  -  iTrader: (0)

Re: M-Audio Or Soundblaster Creative


+1 on the M-Audio. Of the two, I mean. I'm partial to Echo meself...
quote
  #11  
Old 03-21-2006, 06:56 PM
erikm5150  is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 195  -  iTrader: (3)

Re: M-Audio Or Soundblaster Creative


Stay AWAY from Creative for PC recording.
go with M-Audio

the latency with creative is lower because it is PCI and PCI as an interface will give the lowest latencies compared to other ineterfaces such as firewire.
It doesn't mean the creative is good for audio recording. Soundblasters aren't made for that, they're made for games and music "enjoyment". The drivers are not written specifically with streaming audio in mind.

The m-audio is made for audio recording, so its drivers are written for that purpose. Plus, m-audio has a good track record for stable drivers.
quote
  #12  
Old 03-21-2006, 08:31 PM
JESTER700  is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Posts: 2,234  -  iTrader: (0)

Re: M-Audio Or Soundblaster Creative


So, why not consider the PCI versio of the audiophile?
quote
  #13  
Old 03-21-2006, 09:07 PM
red5  is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Williamstown, MA
Posts: 2,639  -  iTrader: (0)

Re: M-Audio Or Soundblaster Creative


Quote:
Originally Posted by Darren Wonnacott
Hey,

The Soundblaster has a better input and output latency than the
M-Audio Soundcard I have.
I have a $100 Audiophile and I can set it to half the latency of ANY card creative has made to date assuming your system will support such low latency. If it's firewire (or usb2) it will have much higher latency than PCI, so I'd suggest PCI.

I've always been trashing the sound quality of the Creative cards such as the Live, and Audigys (they're the same in terms of quality) because the highs are non existant and the lows are very muddy and the very low frequencies are not there. I have the X-Fi however in my new system and it is much much better than any other Creative sound card that I have ever used but still not quite as good as the Audiophile (which is cheaper too btw) in terms of sound quality, but I will keep it in there for the sole reason that it is louder and my receiver isn't very powerful. Also Creative cards tend to make plenty of popping noises when you record on them and distort pretty easily, so I would not recommend one for recording.

The drivers for either are both very stable and will not be an issue there, but the M-Audio mixer utility is certainly useful if you plan to record. The only real problem with the card, which is pretty minor, is that the drivers do not provide a master volume in the windows mixer so your volume keys on the keyboard probably won't work.

Last edited by red5; 03-21-2006 at 09:17 PM.
quote
  #14  
Old 03-21-2006, 09:21 PM
Drew  is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Somerville, MA
Posts: 4,538  -  iTrader: (4)

Re: M-Audio Or Soundblaster Creative


I could have sworn I posted here... My computer came stock with a Creative Audigy 2Z, and I still bought a M-Audio Firewire 410 to record through. The Creative wasn't quite as bad as Red5's making it out to be, but it didn't have nearly the input power as the M-Audio, so unless I turned up seriously loud while recording, I'd have to crank tracks within my multitracker, which introduced rather a lot of noise.
quote
  #15  
Old 03-22-2006, 07:04 AM
Ant1981  is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: .
Posts: 2,181  -  iTrader: (3)

Re: M-Audio Or Soundblaster Creative


Well the creativie is a computer sound card and the M-Audio is decicated to recording audio, so should be obvious really.
quote
Reply

Tags
audio audiophile, audio firewire


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Show/Hide Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Show/Hide Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
G4 APG Graphics 350 Mhz maxed for audio tobe Classified Ads: Guitars and Gear 1 12-29-2005 12:55 AM
FS - Books on game audio dreaming_neon_black Classified Ads: Guitars and Gear 0 11-25-2005 09:39 AM
Audio interface(s) question Kev Brigden Recording Studio 19 02-26-2004 07:09 PM
Loud hum through digital music corp audio switcher tobe Gear and Equipment 14 04-04-2003 03:39 PM
Creative SoundBlaster Audigy 2 Platinum EX PekkaM Recording Studio 1 03-03-2003 04:38 AM

Sitemap:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c) jemsite.com