<back   Jemsite > Guitars and Gear > Recording Studio

Recording Studio To discuss recording gear, home studios, home studio PCs, studio techniques and the likes.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-26-2004, 03:35 AM
aloymetal  is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: malaysia
Posts: 127  -  iTrader: (0)

Recording's software


my band will record an EP at recording studio (not home studio),
but i still confuse....
is recording's software is really important?
some use Cakewalk... some Pro Tools.
i heard Pro Tools have better sound quality
quote
  #2  
Old 05-26-2004, 10:18 AM
darren wilson  is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,190  -  iTrader: (0)
A pro studio is generally going to have Pro Tools.
quote
  #3  
Old 05-26-2004, 01:05 PM
JESTER700  is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Posts: 2,234  -  iTrader: (0)
Pro Studios use Pro Tools a lot, because:
1. It had a head start on market share, so has become a standard
2. It generally is purchased in a package with its own hardware, so there are generally fewer configuration/resource conflict problems

Having said that, if a studio had another solution - Sonar, Samplitude, Audition, Vegas - it could be every bit as good.

One thing's for SURE - sound quality of the files themselves *aren't* dependent on the software, but on the recording hardware.

There are FX plugins available for every platform, so they will vary too. For the same price, I'd take a maxed out $250,000 PT rig over a barebones Sonar one with a cheap USB input. But I'd take a well thought out Sonar one with good hardware over a slapdash PT free one.
quote
  #4  
Old 05-26-2004, 03:28 PM
Soup Kitchen Studios  is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 401  -  iTrader: (0)
Most studios will also have other programs available, even if they run digi hardware. The program you end up using will probably be whatever the engineer who records you is most comfortable with.

So many things change the sound of a recording. Recording technique, Mic choice, Pre-amps, Converters, Sample Rate, bit-depth... the application really has a minimal impact in comparison.
quote
  #5  
Old 05-26-2004, 05:15 PM
Artist  is offline
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London, England
Posts: 795  -  iTrader: (0)
Soup can I ask.

Do you ever bother recording people at higher than 44.1/16?
quote
  #6  
Old 05-26-2004, 05:30 PM
Soup Kitchen Studios  is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 401  -  iTrader: (0)
Yes, all the time. It's standard to work at 24-bit for the majority of projects. Also, anything that is for picture is done at 48K.
quote
  #7  
Old 05-26-2004, 10:05 PM
aloymetal  is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: malaysia
Posts: 127  -  iTrader: (0)
TQ guys.
so i think... hardware and sound engineer is more important right?
i guess... my sound engineer is more familiar with Pro Tools, so i will rent a studio equipped with Pro Tools and i will use POD 2.0 for efx / pre-amp.
TQ again guys.... thanks a lot.
quote
  #8  
Old 05-27-2004, 12:32 AM
Soup Kitchen Studios  is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 401  -  iTrader: (0)
Yes. the engineer and hardware is more important than whether you use pro tools, logic, or DP.

If you must use a POD, at least record it dry so that the engineer doesn't get stuck with those horrible effects. The TDM plugs that will probably be available to you will far surpass the pod.
quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Show/Hide Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Sitemap:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c) jemsite.com