Jackson SL4 - Jemsite
All Other Guitars (including Prestige) Discussion about other Ibanez Guitars not covered in the above topics. Includes J-Custom, USA-Custom, Prestige subforum.

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 1 (permalink) Old 05-02-2002, 11:30 AM Thread Starter
Super Moderator
 
jono's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: England
Posts: 7,112
Reviews: 1
Jackson SL4

Well I tried a gorgeous Amber Sunburst one of these SL4s today and was extremely impressed for the most part. Let's start with the good.

The sound. Normally I find neck-through guitars lack sparkle and snap but this one didn't! Whether this is due to the alder sides or the real Seymour Duncans (I think a TB4 and an SH1n) I don't know or really care, it sounded superb. It blew the RG550EX I tried it against (admittedly the SL4 retails at 300 more than the RG) right out of the water sonically.

Visually it left very little to be desired. Even though it was just a very thin laminated top it exhibited excellent flame and a tasteful and subtle "amber sunburst" very much like the Gary Moore Les Paul. And that's coming from someone who's not into "flame tops" (admittedly I'd have prefered a black back rather than the mid brown stain that was present. EVH's Musicman set the standard on that as far as I'm concerned. Flame top, binding, black back, no arguments.)

The action was slinky and low, just how I like it, with a little but not too much buzz.



Now the bad. The inevitable problems with the Jackson JT580LP (read TRS) bridge that wouldn't play nicely for me, or the very helpful shop guy. At all. It'd need a full set up with screwdrivers and cursing to get it to stay in tune after even slight whammy use.

The other bad thing was the sticky, sticky neck. I don't know if Jackson were using copydex in their lacquer but they might as well have been and I have no idea how much sanding it'd take to get the goop off the back of that neck.


It was on sale at 659 down about 400 from it's retail price!!! Which made it cheaper than the RG550EX. IF only I could have swapped the neck and trem (and ok if we're honest the overall body shape) from the RG to the Jackson we'd have a winner. As it is I'm gonna go find my RG770 from the guitar cupboard and have a blast. when I've finished reading the forum that is
jono is online  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Tags
body shape , gary moore , les paul , seymour duncan , seymour duncans

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Jemsite forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address

IMPORTANT: You will be required to activate your account so please ensure that your email address is correct.

If you do not receive your activation check your spam folder before using the CONTACT US form (at the bottom right of each page).



Email Address:
OR

Log-in











Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Jackson Dk2 vs Ibanez rg1570 vs jackson dk2s reneg All Other Guitars (including Prestige) 12 09-23-2013 11:19 AM
Changing bridge pickup in Jackson from a Jackson CVR2 to a Seymour Duncan SH8 Invader Jacksonmatt13 Pickups & wiring 2 07-20-2010 01:18 PM
WTB: Jackson Kelly or Jackson King V (USA, white) etuor Classified Ads: Guitars and Gear 1 04-07-2007 03:41 AM
FS: Jackson Rhodes, Jackson Neck beast Jem7RB MK Classified Ads: Guitars and Gear 4 06-01-2005 03:21 PM
Jackson Jem? - Did Jackson make a Jem,what was the Green Mea zove All Other Guitars (including Prestige) 1 04-27-2001 11:05 AM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome