Hi Thanks for ur help
I bought a Jackson and it had a fault in it and the shop is going to replace it but I thought I might take the opportunity to buy something a bit more luxurious.
I am doing Higher music in my school this year and plan to play some satriani pieces. so obviously the JS100 would be a good choice, I play loads of stuff that uses the trem but my teach told me the PRS can be set up to do some of what I do although not as extreme as a floyd type trem.
I play Ac/Dc, metallica, queen, as well as others what would be the better all round guitar?
I do like the JS100 but am yet to try the santana...I aint a big fan of Santana, Satch would kill him
but would the PRS have better sustain?
I tried the JS1000 and didnt notice anythin in it that would justify payin twice as much as the JS100 but I know there are differences like Dimarzios, better trem etc..
I am studying higher music this year and plan to play some satch pieces so it would be a good guitar for that purpose, to be honest I dont care for the snobby "I own a PRS" attitude, I think PRS's are very overpriced and it seems that the Santana aint a real PRS cos they seem to not want to let their name put on it...they could at least have put their name on the headstock with a small Santana SE logo, so it would look more expensive
well thanks for your help