Well......be a little more patient.......you've got 2 new anniversary models coming out.....and who cares what the rich "nonce" says....he's buying a PRS - that explains it all
Well considering they are BOTH anniversary models, they will probably be quite exqisite (and quite EXPENSIVEGuitarAkuma said:What are they? Hopefully not another DBK with a different top! Lets get back to the days of looking through the Ibanez catalogue and going "WOW I gotta get me one of these!"
Pretty much what I was going to say. Although I love the sustainer idear.morgtahna said:The big WHY NOT here is that JEM is a signature model. That is why it doesn't evolve how customers would propably wan't it to. It's how Mr. Vai want's it to be. Simple as that.
+1Flobanez said:It would be nice to see new colors anyway....:roll:
Great post!! Iv'e said this before, Ibanez quit making Jems (for me) back in '02 with the new trem change. Here's a funny comparison, my friend just bought a new 28 thousand dollar Harley Davidson and had to change/buy a new carb. because the one that came on it wasn't "really" the one recomended for that model. That's like (to me) buying a new Jem and having to buy/install the locking trem-post screws. I dont mind spending the money, two grand or more for a good guitar. I love the Jems that I have left after owning 7 of them at the same time.GuitarAkuma said:As successfull as the JEM range has been it seem interest is dwindling, the current models are uninspiring and the re-hash of the DBK into a super expensive "exactly the same but with a fragile chrome finish" model does not seem to being the JEM lineage any favours.
Why can't they do a genuinely unique guitar say every 5 years to keep the competition at bay? I mean in the 20 odd years since the 777LNG Jackson has evolved the Soloist to quite a different instrument from the early models, embracing different pickup manufacturers and neck designs, electronics and woods in keeping with artists/customers desires, where as the JEM has had new pickups and a new neck joint (was that 12 years ago?) but essentially is unchanged (excusing the VWH alder body of course).
The JEM these days is seen more as Ibanez' top of the range rock guitar than merely a signature model, even Mr Vai has numerous better designed JEM's than we can buy, so why not give us the legendary JEM with modern updates?
Why can't we get a JEM with a thru neck? Why can't we get a sustainer like Vai's? Why can't we have active electronics or say EMG's? Why can't we have MORE colour and fretboard options per model?
Why can't we ditch the aweful 555 and have a new JEM model in its place?
True, Ibanez may not want to release such things on a JEM so why not on new model? I mean the RG with the Roland Gk pickup is a little late in the day, Fender where doing that in the late 80's and nobody really uses it any more, where as the sustainer is almost standard equipment as are in some cases active electronics and different fretboard woods.
Maybe I am missing some marketing point, but nothing upsets me more than going into a music shop looking at say a 77FP or RMBR and having some rich nonce buying a PRS say "don't bother with that mate it's just a fancy RG550"!
"Idear"? You must be from Maine. :lol:bpd111 said:Pretty much what I was going to say. Although I love the sustainer idear.
Agreed on a new UV. I would love to see a new UV. The UV777BK has been running since '98. 7 years now. I think it's time.buddroyce said:A Jem with a figured top would be nice. How about one with a swamp ash body? While we're at it, I think it's time for a new UV as well. (or maybe keeping the UV and making one similar to the Jem 10th with a mirror pickguard to match the UV)